For years, YouTube has been accused of enabling terrorist recruitment. This allegedly occurs when a person clicks on a terrorist video hosted on the platform, then spirals down a rabbit gap of extremist content material robotically queued “up subsequent” via YouTube’s suggestion engine. In 2016, the household of Nohemi Gonzalez—who was killed in a 2015 Paris terrorist assault after extremists allegedly relied on YouTube for recruitment—sued YouTube proprietor Google, forcing courts to think about YouTube’s alleged function in aiding and abetting terrorists. Google has been defending YouTube ever since. Then, final yr, the Supreme Court docket agreed to listen to the case.
Now, the Gonzalez household is hoping that the excessive courtroom will agree that Part 230 protections designed to protect web sites from liabilities for internet hosting third-party content material shouldn’t be prolonged to additionally shield platforms’ proper to suggest dangerous content material.
Google thinks that’s precisely how the legal responsibility protect ought to work, although. Yesterday, in a courtroom submitting, Google argued that Part 230 protects YouTube’s suggestion engine as a reputable device “meant to facilitate the communication and content material of others.”
Learn 12 remaining paragraphs | Feedback