The feds’ new open-access coverage: Who’s gonna pay for it?

Image of a row of library shelves.

Enlarge / With bodily subscriptions changing into more and more irrelevant, researchers must pay extra to get their analysis revealed. (credit score: Xu Wu / Getty Pictures)

In August, the US authorities introduced that it was adopting a coverage requiring that each one the analysis it funded is open entry. A key factor of this plan is that, as soon as the coverage takes impact, each analysis paper that outcomes from this analysis have to be open entry the day of its publication. Which means anybody can view the analysis—no journal subscription or one-time cost required.

That, clearly, may pose issues for the tutorial publishing enterprise, which relies upon closely on subscriptions as issues are at the moment structured. To adapt to the inevitable future, many publishers have been adopting “article processing fees” (APCs), or charges paid by the individuals publishing the paper for the privilege of doing so. All of that is elevating an ungainly query: Who’s going to pay the APCs?

On Tuesday, the American Affiliation for the Development of Science (AAAS) launched a survey of researchers that implies some are already struggling to seek out the money to cowl APCs, and in some circumstances, are taking it out of budgets that will in any other case pay for scientific work.

Learn 10 remaining paragraphs | Feedback

Related Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *