Historic Greeks and Romans are mentioned to have handled wounds suffered in battle with poultices fabricated from spider silk, believing the silk had therapeutic properties, in addition to utilizing it to deal with pores and skin lesions and warts. There have additionally been reviews of individuals within the Carpathian Mountains utilizing spiderwebs as bandages and docs of ages previous typically prescribed putting silk cocoons on contaminated tooth.
This notion that spider silk may need antimicrobial properties—making it a form of “webiccillin”—has been the main focus of quite a few research during the last decade particularly, with conflicting outcomes. Some discovered proof of antimicrobial exercise, whereas others didn’t. Now researchers at Aarhus College in Denmark have produced the strongest case but in opposition to spider silk’s rumored therapeutic properties, in keeping with a latest paper revealed within the journal iScience. The authors counsel that prior optimistic outcomes are the results of both bacterial contamination, or the usage of solvents within the experiments which have antimicrobial properties.
“Spider silk has all the time been admired and nearly has a legendary standing,” mentioned co-author Trine Bilde, a biologist at Aarhus College. “It is considered one of these myths that appears to have turn out to be ‘established’ by ‘perception’ and never by sturdy empirical help.”
Learn 13 remaining paragraphs | Feedback