Enlarge / Does Meeting Principle have helpful issues to say about evolution? The paper written by its proponents makes that troublesome to inform. (credit score: Andriy Onufriyenko)
Normally, when somebody begins speaking concerning the interface between evolution and physics, it is a prelude to a horrible argument that makes an attempt to assert that evolution cannot probably occur. So, biologists are typically barely leery of even severe makes an attempt at theorizing about bringing the 2 fields nearer.
But this October has seen two papers that declare to explain how a key element of evolutionary idea—choice—suits in with different areas of physics. Each papers are revealed in prestigious journals (Nature and PNAS), to allow them to’t be summarily dismissed. However they’re each fairly restricted in ways in which in all probability are the product of the pursuits and biases of their authors. And one among them would be the worst written paper I’ve ever seen in a serious journal.
So buckle up, and let’s dive into the world of theoretical biology.
Learn 23 remaining paragraphs | Feedback
