On Friday, the Supreme Courtroom heard arguments in two instances that would severely restrict the federal authorities’s capacity to set public well being coverage throughout the pandemic. At problem is whether or not current well being and security authority given to federal businesses by Congress is broad sufficient to cowl the pandemic or whether or not Congress must step in and explicitly authorize the businesses’ actions.
The arguments happen because the US sees an unprecedented surge in COVID-19 instances. Certainly, two of the state legal professionals arguing in opposition to these new public well being measures have been caught up in that surge and needed to take part within the hearings remotely.
For and in opposition to
Two separate instances are being heard right this moment, each concerning govt actions taken by the Biden administration. The primary case entails a rule, issued by the Division of Well being and Human Providers (HHS), overlaying all well being care employees at services that settle for Medicare and Medicaid. The rule requires these employees to be vaccinated except they’re exempted on medical or spiritual grounds. The second case entails a vaccine-or-test mandate issued by the Occupational Security and Well being Administration (OSHA); the mandate would apply to any companies with 100 or extra workers.
Learn eight remaining paragraphs | Feedback